THE TAWAIF, THE ANTI - NAUTCH MOVEMENT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH INDIAN CLASSICAL MUSIC:

Part 6 - The Passing of the Torch

by David Courtney working tools

Dancer with Sitar

 


Part 1 - Introduction
Part 2 - The Tawaifs
Part 3 - Evolution of the Will to End the Tawaifs
Part 4 - Evolution of the Means to End the Tawaifs
Part 5 - The Anti-Nautch Move­ment
Part 6 - The Passing of the Torch - This Page
Part 7 - Affects of the Anti-Nautch Move­ment on North In­dian Music
Part 8 - Epilogue

SUMMARY OF TOPICS COVERED EARLIER

The tawaifs were an In­dian equi­val­ent of the Japan­ese geisha. At the end of the 19th cen­tury there was a Bri­tish in­spired per­se­cu­tion of danc­ing girls.  This per­se­cu­tion in­clu­ded the tawaif.  How­ever for there to be an ef­fec­tive per­se­cu­tion, there had to be both a will as well as the means to carry it out.  The will was pro­vided by a com­bi­na­tion of Vic­tor­ian moral­is­tic and po­li­ti­cal con­si­dera­tions.  The means was pro­vided by the Bri­tish con­so­li­da­tion of their con­trol over the In­dian sub­con­ti­nent.  The per­se­cu­tions star­ted in the South and were ini­tia­lly directed at the temple girls, how­ever they quic­kly spread to the North where the tawaifs be­came the targets.

The arts of the tawaifs did not die with them, but were instead passed on to a new ge­nera­tions of performers who were unconnected with the tawaif trad­ition.  This meta­phoric "passing of the torch" was part of a comp­lex series of ev­ents.  This sec­tion will deal with so­cial and historical pro­cesses be­hind this transfer of these arts.  We will also look at a small sampling of peo­ple who were in­vol­ved in this pro­cess.

 

 

The New So­cial Dynamics

At the height of the anti-nautch moment, a curious chain of ev­ents transpired in India.  The tawaif, the freedom move­ment, and an em­erg­ing cul­tural renaissance in India, were all thrown in together with inter­est­ing re­sults.  In a nutshell, we can say that many peo­ple worked to forge a new India, saved the arts of the tawaif, but at the same time destroyed the tawaif trad­ition.

From the stand­point of the tawaifs, the so­cial dynamics were changing fast.  This was a transitional period in In­dian his­tory, and at times things were quite complicated.  How­ever for the pur­pose of this modest arti­cle, we will look at these things ac­cor­ding to a simple model.

Model for our dis­cus­sions

Model for our dis­cus­sions

In this model there are six things that we need to fami­liarise our­selves with.  They are:

  1. The Tawaifs
  2. The Cultural Renaissance
  3. The Freedom Struggle
  4. The Relationship Between the Freedom Struggle and the Cultural Renaissance
  5. The Relationship Between the Tawaifs and the Freedom Struggle
  6. The Relationship Between the Tawaifs and the Cultural Renaissance

It is inter­est­ing to note how the Bri­tish have fallen out of this pic­ture.  They were still a force to be reckoned with in the early 20th cen­tury, but as far as the tawaifs were con­cerned, they were becoming irrelevant.

Tawaifs - Let us review the state of the tawaifs at the turn of the 20th cen­tury.  The trad­ition had been under pres­sure for more than half a cen­tury.  The dis­so­lu­tion of many of the princely states that had been their pat­ron­age, placed them in a precarious eco­nomic si­tua­tion.  Two de­cades of per­se­cu­tion by Bri­tish, as well as lo­cal so­cial pur­ity organ­isa­tions, re­duced both their eco­nomic status as well as their so­cial standing.  The dif­fi­culty in getting bright young girls who could handle the years of rigourous training was re­du­cing the quality of the tawaifs.  The boycott of their performances made the tawaifs disinclined to put in the ef­forts to main­tain ar­tis­tic stan­dards.  All of these ev­ents conspired to push the tawaifs into the very pros­ti­tu­tion that the so­cial pur­ity activists had long ac­cused them.  But the biggest problem was a lack of so­cial re­lev­ance.  It was clear that that the tawaifs were a dying breed.

Cultural Renaissance - The early part of the 20th cen­tury saw India in the midst of a cul­tural renaissance.  Decades of Eng­lish medium, convent edu­cation, had a inter­est­ing im­pact upon In­dian so­ciety.  It had the de­sired re­sults (at least from the Bri­tish stand­point), of pro­duc­ing an army of capable "babus" who duti­fully car­ried out the administration of India for the benefit of their Bri­tish mas­ters.  Unfor­tunately, it crea­ted a peculiar, al­most slave mentality among this class.  There were deep rooted feel­ings of inadequacy bordering on self-loathing.  Just as in the physi­cal world where every ac­tion has its reaction, so too we find si­mi­lar reactions manifest in the so­cial arena.  In many quar­ters, the mid­dle class begins to deeply reject the mind­set of self-loathing and inadequacy and begins to take pride in their In­dian self-identity.

But the ob­vious ques­tion was "What is this self-identity?"  This thirst for a sense of In­dian self-identity fuelled a very powerful cul­tural renaissance.  Across the sub­con­ti­nent, peo­ple star­ted to take note of vir­tually every piece of folk art, classical art, music, dance and what-not, that they could find.  People were actively engaged in discovering, and at times even fabricating a self-identity.

Freedom Move­ment - It is ironic that it was the Bri­tish that crea­ted the basic frame­work for both the In­dian freedom move­ment as well as a united and free India.  From Kanya Kumari to the Himalayas, the Bri­tish had es­tab­lished Eng­lish medium schools where In­dians be­came fami­liar with Eu­ro­pean con­cepts (including the Eu­ro­pean con­cept of nationalism).  This bour­geoi­sie, had the ab­ility to move from North to South and East to West and meet with other In­dians who had compatible world views.  The Bri­tish had unwittingly united a sub­con­ti­nent that had been divided for ages by po­li­ti­cal, linguistic, and cul­tural differences.  In this en­vi­ron­ment, the formation of a in­depen­dence move­ment was inevitable.

Such pan-ethnism of the In­dian bour­geoi­sie may have been very convenient in the early days of the freedom struggle, but it was neither suf­fi­cient, nor an appropriate a vehicle to build a sense of national identity.  It was clear there had to be an In­dian sense of self-identity if the struggle for freedom were to be suc­cess­ful.

The freedom move­ment was by no means homo­gen­ous., for there were many ap­proaches and ideas.  Some espoused largely non-violent, eco­nomic means (e.g., Gandhi, Nehru).  Some advocated a mili­tary ap­proach (e.g., Chandra Bose).  Some advocated for grass roots guerrilla ac­tivi­ties (e.g., Bhagat Singh).  Re­gard­less of which ap­proach a freedom fighter was adhering to, they could not forget past failings.

Relationship Between the Freedom Struggle and the Cultural Renaissance - The fail­ure of the Up­ris­ing of 1857 was not lost to this new ge­nera­tion of freedom fighters.  It was re­cog­nised that one of the rea­sons that the Up­ris­ing failed, was that after initial mili­tary successes, there was a sense of "now what".  The con­cept of a unified "Azad-e-Hind" (Independent India), was missing.  The Up­ris­ing of 1857 was com­prised of disparate In­dian elements who had legitimate grievances, but no clear plan as to what to do after the Bri­tish were defeated.  This lack of a clear goal al­lowed the Crown to mobilise her mili­tary strength and suppress the insurrection.  The In­dian intelligentsia were determined that this would not happen again.

British retaliation ag­ainst Up­ris­ing

British retaliation ag­ainst Up­ris­ing

The intelligentsia of the freedom move­ment were very aware of the problem.  They realised that the only way to avoid the fragmentation and lack of direction, was to create and main­tain a unified sense of self-identity.  This was in no way a simple task; historically the South Asian sense of self-identity was determined by communal identifications.

Many dif­fer­ent ap­proaches were used.  Not all of which had the same level of ef­fec­tiveness.  Some ac­tually tur­ned out to be counter productive.

Many invoked invoke the mythical con­cept of Bharat Varsha, as a tool to help the com­mon man grasp the con­cept of nationalism.  The image of Bharat Varsha as promulgated by many freedom fighters, was that of a period when all of South Asia (according many, the en­tire world) was governed by Hindu dharma.  This may have been a convenient introduction to the con­cept of nationalism for many com­moners, but unfortunately it would have uncomfortable repercussion by alienating large por­tions of the Muslim popu­la­tions of South Asia.

The All India Muslim League was es­tab­lished in 1906, but gained pop­ular­ity in the 1930s; it began to push a very dif­fer­ent agenda.  Their sup­porters ten­ded to push Islam, along with the Urdu Language, as their means of establishing a sense of self-identity.

All India Muslim League 1936

All India Muslim League 1936

The In­dian Nat­ional Congress was attempting to avoid a partition of India.  It was clear that the Bharat Varsha ap­proach would only fur­ther alienate the Musilim minorities.  How­ever concentrating on trad­itional arts seemed a very safe way to create a national identity with­out causing any problems.  There­fore, the sup­port of the arts be­came a compo­nent of the freedom struggle.  Even after in­depen­dence it was still pursued.  Although the objective of attaining in­depen­dence was achieved, there was still the issue of national integration.

Indian Nat­ional Congress hunts for a way to create a national identity

Indian Nat­ional Congress hunts for a way to create a national identity

Of course this is all his­tory now.  The All India Muslim League and the In­dian Nat­ional Congress con­tin­ued pursuing very dif­fer­ent agendas, and using very dif­fer­ent ap­proaches; and India and Pakistan were separated in 1947.

Relationship Between the Tawaifs and the Freedom Struggle - The tawaifs and their place within the freedom struggle was problematic from the very begin­ning.  On one hand, the Bri­tish made it very clear that they would never sup­port the tawaifs; therefore any sig­ni­fi­cant sup­port for the Bri­tish Raj by the tawaifs was not really a con­sideration.  But it was also clear that there was not going to be much sup­port from the freedom move­ment as well.  Founding mem­bers of both the In­dian Nat­ional congress as well as the All India Muslim league were products of an Eng­lish Vic­tor­ian school sys­tem.  There­fore, they had a strong tendency to reject the tawaifs outright as mere pros­ti­tutes.

That is not to say that there were not inter­actions bet­ween freedom fighters and the tawaifs; but this did not re­pre­sent an endorsement of the tawaifs.  Individual tawaifs were known on occasion to sup­port the In­dian Nat­ional Congress with finan­cial con­tri­butions; but there was really no reciprocation of sup­port by the in­depen­dence move­ment.  It was clear that as a mat­ter of policy, the In­dian Nat­ional Congress con­si­dered the tawaifs to be a so­cial evil; one, like sati (self immolation of widows upon husband's funeral pyre), child mar­riages, and restrictions on widow remarriage, needed to be elimi­nated.

Relationship Between the Tawaifs and the Cultural Renaissance - The role of the tawaif in the cul­tural renaissance was ext­remely complicated and at times troublesome.  Many in the mid­dle class admired and re­spec­ted the arts of the tawaifs, but they could not relate to the cul­ture of the tawaif.  The tawaifs still tried to main­tain 18th cen­tury world views, while the mid­dle class were firmly embracing the 20th cen­tury.

Simply put, the arts of the tawaifs were taken from them and given to the mid­dle class.  This pro­cess has at times assu­med very dif­fer­ent value judgements.  Those sympathetic to the tawaifs, tend to view their arts as be­ing stolen from them.  Others who are more sympathetic with the mid­dle class nature of the renaissance, look upon it as a form of democratisation of the art-forms.  They point out that in the old feudal sys­tem, the only peo­ple who could enjoy theses arts were the ext­remely wealthy ruling classes.  They look at the passing of the arts from the tawaif to the populace as a cul­tural "redistribution of wealth".  If I may interject my own feel­ings, I look upon it as a "rescue" of the arts.  It was clear that the tawaifs were disappearing and it was neces­sary to find a new home for their arts, otherwise they may have disappeared.

 

The Rescuers

The passing of the tawaif's arts to the mid­dle class was not an easy job.  It could not have been done with­out the sacrifice, and hard work, of many peo­ple.  This in­clu­ded tawaifs as well as mem­bers of the mid­dle class.  This pro­cess re­quired the mid­dle class to submerge them­sel­ves into the kotha cul­ture of music­ians, poets, and tawaifs; take their arts; and then use modern ap­proaches to preserve and propagate them.  Such endeavours in­vol­ved com­bi­na­tions of modern musicology, gramophone recordings, pub­lication of books, and a wide range of ac­tivi­ties.  Although we con­sider such ac­tivi­ties normal today, they were unknown to many of the tawaifs, and con­si­dered to be re­vo­lu­tionary at the time.

 

A Few Famous Tawaifs of the Time

Many peo­ple need to be thanked for the rescue of these arts.  These were tawaifs who broke with trad­ition in very impor­tant ways.  We must re­mem­ber that the pro­fes­sional cul­ture of the kothas was cha­rac­terised by ext­reme pro­fes­sional secrecy.  Tabla players fre­quen­tly used to refuse to perform cer­tain material in the pre­sence of other tabla players.  I am told that there was a sarangi player who used to play with his fingers be­hind a veil so that no one could see his technique.  Tawaifs used to perform their arts only before ext­remely select viewers.  When we re­mem­ber this al­most paranoid obsession with pro­fes­sional secrets, it is very remarkable that these tawaifs were wil­ling to perform before large pub­lic audiences.  The fact that they would be wil­ling to have their songs recorded on disk was it­self remarkable.  The fact that they would accept as dance students peo­ple who were not speci­fically chosen to carry on the trad­ition in the kothas was amazing.  All of these things point to a degree of forward-thinking that was rare in that cul­ture.  For such forward-thinking, we owe them an amazing debt of gratitude.

Let us look at a few of these remarkable tawaifs:

Jaddanbai (1892-1949) - Jaddanbai was a tawaif who by all accounts was an ext­remely remarkable woman.  She is mostly re­mem­bered as the mother of the Bollywood film star Nargis, and grandmother to Sanjay Dutt.  How­ever in her time, she was a master music composer, singer, actress, and even film maker.  It is inter­est­ing to note that there is a persistent rumour that Jaddanbai was the illegitimate daughter of Motilal Nehru by way of her mother, the fa­mous tawaif Daleepabai of Allahabad.

Jaddanbai (extreme right) with Dilip Kumar, Nargis, and Mehboob

Jaddanbai (extreme right) with Dilip Kumar, Nargis, and Mehboob.

Gauhar Jan (1873-1930) - Gauhar Jan was a tawaif whose birth name was Angelina Yeoward, when her mother converted to Islam, Angelina took the name Gauhar.  She was very gifted in both sing­ing and kathak dance; she was only 15 when she gave her first performance.  She was very fa­mous in Calcutta in the early part of the 20th cen­tury.  We are fortunate that she has left us with over nu­mer­ous recordings made du­ring her lifetime.

Gauhar Jan with Gramaphone

Gauhar Jan with Gramophone.

Begum Akhtar (1914 - 1974) - Finally we must also not forget the late Begum Akhtar.  She may be con­si­dered one of the last of the tawaifs.  She gave her first pub­lic performance at the age of 15; we are fortunate that she lived re­cen­tly enough that a large num­ber of her gazals, dadras and thumris could be preserved in recordings.  Her influence over the mus­ical world cannot be overstated.

 

Begum Akhtar

Begum Akhtar.







A Few Famous Non-Tawaifs of the Time

Our gratitude must also be extended to non-tawaifs as well.  As the tawaif trad­ition was declining, there had to be non-tawaifs ready to receive the arts and carry them on.  The hardships endured by the non-tawaifs in this pro­cess was no less than their tawaif sisters.  Although they were products of a dif­fer­ent cul­tures and dif­fer­ent times, they still had to endure con­si­der­able amount of os­tra­cism.

But the dif­fi­culties of the non-tawaifs extended be­yond mere so­cial pres­sures.  The pro­cess of propagating theses arts in a new en­vi­ron­ment re­quired an extra­ordin­ary degree of innovation.  We must not underestimate the enormity of the task of translating an art-form from one time to an­other, from one place to an­other, and from one cul­ture to an­other.  Never forget that a 19th cen­tury kotha was a very dif­fer­ent place from a 20th cen­tury auditorium.  The music business in the 20th cen­tury re­quired con­si­der­ably more flexibility than the sys­tem of royal pat­ron­age of the 19th cen­tury.  In all, the job of be­ing recipients of this art-form was a very challenging task.

Men played an es­pec­ially impor­tant role in the perpetuation of these art-forms.  During the height of the anti-nautch per­se­cu­tions, only men could perform with­out fear of be­ing ac­cused of pros­ti­tutes.  There­fore one should not be surprised to find a fair num­ber of men among the peo­ple we must thank.

Sukhdev Maharaj & Sitara Devi (circa 1920 -) - Two very impor­tant non-tawaifs were Sukhdev Maharaj and his daughter Sitara Devi.  Although the name Sukhdev Maharaj is vir­tually unknown, Sitara Devi is re­mem­bered as a very fa­mous kathak dancer.

Sukhdev Maharaj was a Brahmin from Varanasi (Benares) who was a well known Sanskrit scholar of the Vaishnava trad­ition.  He was also a very accomplished kathak dancer, and earned his liv­ing performing and teaching.  He taught the art of kathak to both his sons as well as his daughters.  He even had a school in Benares where he taught many peo­ple.  For this, he suffered a tre­men­dous degree of os­tra­cism, but he persevered.

It was Sukhdev Maharaj's daughter Sitara Devi (born early 1920's), who really be­came fa­mous.  Her birth name was Dhanalaksmi, but she was nicknamed Dhano.  She ini­tia­lly had informal training under her father, but when it be­came clear that she had talent, her training was then entrusted to her older sister, Tara (Tara was the mother of the fa­mous dancer Gopi Krishna).  It was about that time that she assu­med her stage name "Sitara Devi" (lit. "Star Goddess").  When she was still a young girl, her family moved to Bombay.  There she con­tin­ued to perfect her art.  Very early on, she was danc­ing in the films.  How­ever she gave this up, feeling that the film world was ill suited to her trad­itionalist tastes in dance.  She con­tin­ued to dance for many de­cades and won a great many honours.

Sitara Devi

Sitara Devi

Vishnu Digambar Paluskar (1872-1931) - One other per­son that we are indebted to is Vishnu Digambar Paluskar.  He es­tab­lished the first modern school of music: this was the Gandharva Mahavidyalaya which was es­tab­lished in Lahore in 1901.  This school was open to all, and was struc­tured along the lines of the nu­mer­ous Eng­lish medium schools which had been set up in India in the later half of the 19th cen­tury.  This model is still used for the var­ious government and private schools, spread across India today.

Vishnu Digambar Paluskar

Vishnu Digambar Paluskar

Vishnu Narayan Bhatkhande (1860-1936) - It is inter­est­ing that one of the non-tawaifs that we are indebted to was ac­tually a lawyer; this was Vishnu Narayan Bhatkhande.  We are indebted to him for documenting a vast corpus of rags and compositions, and codifying the north In­dian sys­tem of music.  Fur­ther­more, it is his sys­tem of notation which is the most widely accepted in Nort­hern India.  At the turn of the 20th cen­tury, he published his four vol­ume magnum opus entitled Hindustani Sangeet Paddhati.  Even today, it is con­si­dered to be the standard reference work on the sub­ject.

Vishnu Narayan Bhatkhande

Vishnu Narayan Bhatkhande

Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941) - Perhaps the name which is most associated with the cul­tural renaissance was Rabindranath Tagore.  He was active in a num­ber of endeavours including music, poetry, liter­ature, and religion.  He be­came the first In­dian to win the Nobel prize when in 1913, he won the Nobel Prize for liter­ature.  He composed a vast num­ber of songs, based upon trad­itional and classical music; today these are known as Rabindra Sangeet.  His con­tri­butions to the development of the ar­tis­tic scene of the late 19th and early 20th cen­tury cannot be overstated.  It was al­most as if he per­sonally epitomised the cul­tural renaissance of India.

Rabindranath Tagore

Rabindranath Tagore

It is pointless to give any more than these few samples of music­ians, dan­cers, and scholars who were re­spon­sible for saving these art-forms du­ring an ext­remely trying period of In­dian his­tory.  We can only hope that these few examples will, at least illustrate the hardships that both the tawaifs as well as the non-tawaifs had to endure, so that we can enjoy classical music and dance today.

 

 

Previous Page | Top of Page | Next Page




Part 1 - Introduction
Part 2 - The Tawaifs
Part 3 - Evolution of the Will to End the Tawaifs
Part 4 - Evolution of the Means to End the Tawaifs
Part 5 - The Anti-Nautch Move­ment
Part 6 - The Passing of the Torch
Part 7 - Affects of the Anti-Nautch Move­ment on North In­dian Music - Next Page
Part 8 - Epilogue

 

© 1998 - 2021 David and Chandrakantha Courtney

For comments, cor­rections, and sug­gestions, kindly contact David Courtney at [email protected]