THE TAWAIF, THE ANTI - NAUTCH MOVEMENT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH INDIAN CLASSICAL MUSIC:

Part 5 - The Anti-Nautch Move­ment

by David Courtney working tools

Tawaifs

 




Part 1 - Introduction
Part 2 - The Tawaifs
Part 3 - Evolution of the Will to End the Tawaifs
Part 4 - Evolution of the Means to End the Tawaifs
Part 5 - The Anti-Nautch Move­ment - This Page
Part 6 - The Passing of the Torch
Part 7 - Affects of the Anti-Nautch Move­ment on North In­dian Music
Part 8 - Epilogue

SUMMARY OF TOPICS COVERED EARLIER

The tawaifs were an In­dian equi­val­ent of the Japan­ese geisha. At the end of the 19th cen­tury there was a Bri­tish in­spired per­se­cu­tion of danc­ing girls.  This per­se­cu­tion in­clu­ded the tawaif.  How­ever for there to be an ef­fec­tive per­se­cu­tion, there had to be both a will as well as the means to carry it out.  The will was pro­vided by a com­bi­na­tion of Vic­tor­ian moral­is­tic and po­li­ti­cal con­si­dera­tions.  The means was pro­vided by the Bri­tish con­so­li­da­tion of their con­trol over the In­dian sub­con­ti­nent.

We have shown at great lengths the mus­ter­ing of both the will to exe­cute an anti-nautch move­ment, as well as the ev­ents which gave Bri­tain suf­fi­cient re­sour­ces and con­trol over the sub­con­ti­nent to ac­tually carry it out.  In this next sec­tion, we will see how var­ious so­cial forces and im­perial ma­chinery fell into place for the exe­cu­tion of the anti-autch move­ment.  We will get a glimpse as to how it was car­ried out.  We will also exam­ine the dis­so­lu­tion of the tawaif trad­ition.

 

 

Conditions In India Leading to the Anti Nautch Move­ment

By the late 19th cen­tury, many things had chan­ged in re­gards to Bri­tish liv­ing in India.  Whereas a cen­tury ear­lier, so­cial inter­course bet­ween In­dians and Bri­tish ex­pat­riates had been ex­ten­sive, in the Vic­tor­ian era, this ten­ded to be frowned upon.  Earlier ge­nera­tions of Bri­tish freely mar­ried In­dian wo­men and merged with the lo­cal popu­la­tion.  But in Vic­tor­ian India, inter­actions were care­fully pro­scribed by eti­quette.  Any Bri­tisher who went be­yond the neces­sary inter­actions might be ac­cused of "going nat­ive".  This was of course a great so­cial sin and caused the of­fen­der to be sub­jected to ext­reme os­tra­cism.  While ear­lier ge­nera­tions of Bri­tish knew very well that they were eco­nomically and technologically no better than their In­dian counterparts, later Bri­tish were comp­letely con­vin­ced that Bri­tish cul­ture was su­per­ior to In­dian cul­ture in every re­gard.  This mind­set crea­ted a wides­pread dis­dain for the lo­cal cul­ture and trad­itions.

Such dis­dain for the lo­cal cul­ture was easily demon­stra­ted in the deter­iorat­ing re­la­tions bet­ween the Bri­tish and tawaifs.  In the early days of the East India com­pany, it was very normal for Bri­tish to hire nautch-girls (many of whom were tawaifs) to dance at their so­cial func­tions.  How­ever by the later part of the 19th cen­tury, so­cial func­tions ten­ded to be more of the ball­room danc­ing that one might find in Eng­land.  In­dian danc­ing star­ted to be frowned upon.

Official func­tion with trad­itional nautch

Official func­tion with trad­itional nautch




The rising un­ac­cept­abil­ity of In­dian dance and its prac­ti­tion­ers is il­lus­tra­ted by an in­ci­dent that oc­cur­red in 1890.  Prince Albert vi­si­ted India and was enter­tained to a trad­itional In­dian dance.  Visiting dig­ni­tar­ies had been enter­tained to trad­itional In­dian dance for as long as any­one was aware; how­ever this time things were lit­tle dif­fer­ent.  There were pro­tests from many quar­ters, es­pec­ially from a Chris­tian mis­sion­ary by the name of Rever­end J. Murdoch.  He prin­ted a num­ber of pub­li­ca­tions stron­gly con­dem­ning these "nautch par­ties" and called for all Bri­tish to re­frain from at­tend­ing them.

The per­se­cu­tions of In­dian dan­cers by Rever­end Murdoch was just a small in­di­ca­tion of a so­cial phe­no­menon that was em­erg­ing.  This was the spread of the So­cial Pur­ity move­ment from Great Bri­tain to India.  As it tur­ned out, once the So­cial Pur­ity Move­ment spread to India, it would as­sume a cha­rac­ter that in some ways was dif­fer­ent from its ori­gi­nal Bri­tish form.

The large num­ber of mis­sion­ary based pub­lish­ing houses was one rea­son for the rise of the anti-nautch move­ment.  The Chris­tian mis­sion­aries con­trolled a very sig­ni­fi­cant por­tion of the pub­lish­ing houses in the sub­con­ti­nent.  Initially this pub­lish­ing in­fra­struc­ture was de­voted to the pub­lication of bibles in the var­ious in­di­ge­nous lan­gua­ges.  How­ever as the ca­pa­city of these pub­lish­ing houses in­crea­sed, they very quic­kly branched off into other di­rec­tions as mo­ti­va­ted by is­sues of the day.  By the lat­ter part of the 19th cen­tury, In­dian dance was con­si­dered to be one such issue.  One of the early agi­ta­tors ag­ainst In­dian dance was the "Mad­ras Chris­tian Liter­ature So­ciety"; they prin­ted a fair amount of anti-nautch liter­ature.

The views of many of these Chris­tian mis­sion­aries were at times ext­reme.  Many Chris­tian pub­li­ca­tions went so far as to say that sim­ply look­ing at an In­dian dance was suf­fi­cient to arouse un­chris­tian feel­ings.  But it was not just Bri­tish and In­dian Chris­tian con­verts that were be­hind the Anti-Nautch moment, the In­dian bour­geoi­sie was also in­vol­ved.

 

Anti-Nautch Move­ment in Full Force

It is dif­fi­cult to as­cribe the birth of a move­ment to a par­ti­cu­lar date, but for the pur­pose of this arti­cle we will con­sider 1892 to be the birth of the anti-nautch move­ment.  This was the year that an an ap­peal was put forth by the "Hindu So­cial Re­forms As­socia­tions" si­mul­ta­neously to the Go­ver­nor Ge­ne­ral of India and the Go­ver­nor of Mad­ras.  The of­fic­ial rep­lies from both the Vice­roy and the Go­ver­nor of Mad­ras were po­lite, but clearly de­nied any con­nec­tion bet­ween dev­dasis, dance girls, and pros­ti­tu­tion.

However, re­li­gious zea­lots have never been ones to allow facts to inter­fere with their think­ing.  They were re­so­lute in their ef­forts.  Since they were un­able to get any of­fic­ial ac­tion on this mat­ter, they star­ted to di­rec­tly tar­get individuals who hired dan­cers to entertain at their so­cial func­tions.  They called for the Bri­tish to boycott dance girls and func­tions where "nautch-walis" were hired.

The anti-nautch move­ment very quic­kly spread from the dev­dasis of the South, to the tawaifs in the North.  As so­cial pur­ity organ­isa­tions were es­tab­lished in Nort­hern India, the tawaif be­came the tar­get there.  In the next few de­cades, organ­isa­tions such as the "Punjab Pur­ity As­socia­tion" (Lahore), the "Social Service League" (Bombay), and a host of others were es­tab­lished.  One pub­lication from the "Punjab Pur­ity As­socia­tion" quotes the so­cial reformer Keshub Chandra Sen as saying that the nautch-girl was a "hideous woman...hell in her eyes.  In her breast is a vast ocean of poison.  Round her comely waist dwell the furies of hell.  Her hands are brandishing unseen daggers ever ready to strike unwary or wilful victims that fall in her way.  Her blandishments are India's ruin.  Alas! her smile is India's death."

Salvation Army in India

Salvation Army in India

Another example of the ext­reme zeal of many who pursued the anti-nautch moment may be seen in the case of miss Helen Tennant.  She truly believed that it was her assignment from God to abolish dance girls.  She came all the way from Eng­land to India for this pur­pose.

The ef­forts of the anti-nautch activists con­tin­ued unabated for years.  It spread out of the circles of mis­sion­aries and so­cial pur­ity reformers, and into the mainstream.  It finally reached a point where in 1905, contrary to trad­ition, it was de­cided not to have an In­dian dance at the reception for the Prince of Wales in Mad­ras.

At this time, the si­tua­tion of the tawaif was very bad.  The so­cial expectations crea­ted by the anti-nautch move­ment had be­come a self fulfilling prophesy.  Decades of per­se­cu­tion and a boycott of their arts, crea­ted an en­vi­ron­ment of desperation for the tawaifs.  They were un­able to pursue their arts due to so­cial pres­sures; therefore there be­came lit­tle incentive to main­tain ar­tis­tic stan­dards.  In such desperate circumstances, the tawaifs had no recourse for survival other than the com­mon pros­ti­tu­tion for which they had been ac­cused.

In this en­vi­ron­ment, there were ser­ious con­cerns whether their art-forms would survive.  The kathak dance, the thumree, the gazal,and dadra, were all under ser­ious pres­sure.  But as we will see, there was a curious and comp­lex chain of ev­ents which transpired which rescued the art-forms, even though the tawaif trad­ition it­self was be­yond be­ing saved.

 

 

Previous Page | Top of Page | Next Page




Part 1 - Introduction
Part 2 - The Tawaifs
Part 3 - Evolution of the Will to End the Tawaifs
Part 4 - Evolution of the Means to End the Tawaifs
Part 5 - The Anti-Nautch Move­ment
Part 6 - The Passing of the Torch - Next Page
Part 7 - Affects of the Anti-Nautch Move­ment on North In­dian Music
Part 8 - Epilogue

 

© 1998 - 2021 David and Chandrakantha Courtney

For comments, cor­rections, and sug­gestions, kindly contact David Courtney at [email protected]