THE TAWAIF, THE ANTI - NAUTCH MOVEMENT, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH INDIAN CLASSICAL MUSIC:

Part 4 - Evolution of the Means to End the Tawaifs

by David Courtney working tools

Queen victoria

 




Part 1 - Introduction
Part 2 - The Tawaifs
Part 3 - Evolution of the Will to End the Tawaifs
Part 4 - Evolution of the Means to End the Tawaifs - This Page
Part 5 - The Anti-Nautch Move­ment
Part 6 - The Passing of the Torch
Part 7 - Affects of the Anti-Nautch Move­ment on North In­dian Music
Part 8 - Epilogue

SUMMARY OF TOPICS COVERED EARLIER

The tawaifs were an In­dian equi­val­ent of the Japan­ese Geisha.  We fami­liar­ised our­selves with a num­ber of basic con­cepts.  We also looked at a few fa­mous tawaifs of old.  We saw how the rise of evan­gel­icalism and Chris­tian fun­da­men­tal­ism in Great Bri­tain spil­led over into India, creat­ing an en­vi­ron­ment ripe for the per­se­cu­tion of the tawaifs as well as other danc­ing girls.  This was re­in­for­ced by rising in­ci­dence of sex­ually trans­mit­ted dis­eases.

It is clear that in order for there to be a func­tion­ing Bri­tish lead anti-nautch move­ment in India, there had to be a sig­ni­fi­cant Bri­tish pre­sence in India.  By sig­ni­fi­cant, we really mean two things.  First the num­ber of Bri­tish in India needed to be suf­fi­cien­tly high that they could affect this sort of thing.  Se­condly, they had to have a mili­tary, so­cial, and ad­mi­ni­stra­tive frame­work with the ca­pa­city to do so.

The Bri­tish pre­sence at the end of the 19th cen­tury was very dif­fer­ent from what it had been a cen­tury ear­lier.  It is clear that a cen­tury ear­lier, the Bri­tish could not have ex­ecu­ted an anti-nautch move­ment.  So what were the ev­ents which al­tered this pre­sence in India.  It turns out that there was a fun­da­men­tal shift in ad­mi­ni­stra­tive phi­lo­sophy.  This change in the Bri­tish ap­proach to­wards India, coup­led with ge­ne­ral im­prove­ments in tech­no­logy and trans­por­ta­tion, gave Bri­tain the where-with-all to con­so­li­date its con­trol over India.  This page will chro­ni­cle Great Bri­tain's ever tigh­ten­ing con­trol over India in the 19th cen­tury.

 

 

The Orientalist / Anglicist Debate

There was a major de­bate in the 19th cen­tury as to how the Bri­tish were going to ad­mi­ni­ster the In­dian sub­con­ti­nent.  There were ba­si­cally two fac­tions.  One group was the "or­ien­tal­ists"; this group main­tained that lo­cal trad­itions, lan­gua­ges, and po­li­ti­cal struc­tures should be used and mani­pula­ted as much as pos­sible for an ef­fec­tive con­trol of the sub­con­ti­nent.  The other group were the "ang­li­cists"; this group held that India should be ad­mi­ni­stered along a stric­tly Eng­lish model.  Ac­cor­ding to the ang­li­cists, India should be moul­ded and chan­ged to ref­lect Bri­tish stan­dards and mores.  In the begin­ning of the 19th cen­tury, India was ad­mi­ni­stered by an orien­ta­list ap­proach; how­ever by the end of this cen­tury, the ap­proach was solidly ang­li­cist.  Let us look at the var­ious ev­ents which brought such a fun­da­men­tal change in ad­mi­ni­stra­tive phi­lo­sophy.

Orientalism - In the early days of the East India Com­pany, the pre­do­mi­nate phi­lo­sophy was orientalism.  Their ap­proach was to quietly in­si­nu­ate them­sel­ves into In­dian so­ciety.  Once there, the Bri­tish mani­pula­ted the sub­con­ti­nent by a comp­lex sys­tem of trea­ties and agree­ments.  They fre­quen­tly set one prin­ci­pal­ity ag­ainst an­other, thus weaken­ing both par­ties in the pro­cess, and then ex­trac­ted what­ever lands, rights, or trea­ties that they de­sired.  In short, the Bri­tish gen­erally re­lied upon sub­ter­fuge and stealth to ob­tain their de­sired ob­jec­tives.  They only re­sor­ted to mili­tary inter­ven­tion when other meth­ods failed.  The orien­ta­list ap­proach was deemed to be very suc­cess­ful be­cause it al­lowed a very small num­ber of Bri­tish to ef­fec­tively con­trol the en­tire In­dian sub­con­ti­nent.

East India Com­pany Official

Orientalist of­fic­ial of the East India Com­pany (circa 1760)

Seeds of Anglicism - The first sign that things might change came in the late 18th cen­tury.  This was when many in Great Bri­tain were ques­tion­ing the East India Com­pany's of­fic­ial re­sis­tance to mis­sion­ary ac­tivi­ties.  Great Bri­tain was in the grips of a great re­li­gious wave of fun­da­men­tal­ism that has come to be known as the "Se­cond Great Awa­ken­ing".  Many in Great Bri­tain viewed India as be­ing a heat­hen land, and that merely making a pro­fit was not enough.  They con­si­dered it their "Chris­tian duty" to add evan­gel­ism to the list of ac­tivi­ties to which the East India Com­pany should be in­vol­ved.  Although the more prag­ma­tic mem­bers of the com­pany stron­gly reject this pro­po­si­tion, the power of the evan­gel­icals in­crea­sed.  1813 was a tur­ning point in this re­gard, for it was in this year that Par­lia­ment re­newed the char­ter of East India Com­pany, but at­ta­ched to this was a clause guar­an­tee­ing Chris­tian mis­sion­aries ac­cess and freedom to work in India.

For a num­ber of years the East India Com­pany con­tin­ued its op­era­tions.  As a mat­ter of prac­ti­cal­ity, the orien­ta­list ap­proach was still the the pre­vail­ing phi­lo­sophy.  But the seeds of ang­licism had al­ready been sewn.

 

Ascendancy of Anglicism

The Ang­li­cists did not stay in the back­ground very long.  Events came to pass that sud­denly thrust the ang­li­cists to the fore, and re­le­ga­ted the orien­ta­lists to his­tory.

Orientalism was called into ques­tion by the the Up­ris­ing of 1857.  This up­rising was viewed in Great Bri­tain as a sign of fail­ure of Or­iental­ism; they claimed that a to­tally dif­fer­ent ap­proach was neces­sary, and that a more hands-on ap­proach was neces­sary.  The East India com­pany's hold­ings came di­rec­tly under the crown in 1858, at which point the East India Com­pany ef­fec­tively ceased to be any re­lev­ance in In­dian af­fairs.

Now that the ang­li­cists had con­trol of the sub­con­ti­nent, they em­bar­ked upon one of the most am­bi­tious pro­jects of so­cial en­gi­neer­ing the world had ever seen.  Led by Lord Macaulay and a host of Ang­li­cists min­ions, they set about to re­make India along the lines of Great Bri­tain.

Lord Macaulay

Lord Macaulay




The churches duti­fully took over the major job of set­ting up schools where bright young In­dian lads were ed­uca­ted.  This edu­cation re­vol­ved around aca­demic sub­jects that were all ac­cor­ding to Bri­tish stan­dards.  Their gra­du­ates were duly taken up and given em­ploy­ment in the var­ious Bri­tish es­tab­lish­ments, thus creat­ing a whole new "babu" class.

The mind­set of this In­dian bour­geoi­sie was comp­lex and not at all homo­gen­ous.  We must re­mem­ber that it was from this class that the in­depen­dence move­ment em­er­ged.  But in the 19th cen­tury, the ma­jor­ity embraced the Vic­tor­ian at­ti­tudes of the day.  As we will see, this would have dire con­se­quen­ces for the tawaifs, for they would join with their im­perial mas­ters in the coming anti-nautch move­ment.

 

Why Did Bri­tain Do This?

It is clear that such a mas­sive under­taking re­quired a tre­men­dous amount of re­sour­ces.  One would natu­rally ques­tion why Eng­land would be wil­ling to in­vest these re­sour­ces in an area on the op­po­site side of the globe.  The an­swer to this very fun­da­men­tal ques­tion was that Great Bri­tain did not have a choice.  It had be­come an abso­lute im­pera­tive due to a comp­lex series of ev­ents oc­cur­ring in a to­tally dif­fer­ent part of the world.  These ev­ents cas­ca­ded like do­min­oes from a de­ci­sion made by a man by the name of Pierre Gustave Toutant Beau­regard.

Pierre Gustave Toutant Beau­regard

Pierre Gustave Toutant Beau­regard, leader of Con­fe­der­ate troops in Charles­ton

This chain of ev­ents worked like this.  Beau­regard was a Bri­ga­dier Gen­eral in the Con­fe­der­ate States of Ame­rica, in con­trol of sol­diers in the City of Charles­ton, South Caro­lina.  In Charles­ton harbour, was Fort Sump­ter, which was oc­cu­pied by the Uni­ted States.  On April 10, 1861, Ge­ne­ral Beau­regard or­dered the Ameri­can forces to sur­ren­der the fort.  On April 12, when they re­fused, Beau­regard or­dered the Con­fe­der­ate forces to open fire.  This of­fic­ially star­ted the War Bet­ween the States.  The es­ca­la­tion of the US Civil War pro­cee­ded in a fash­ion that is well known to many peo­ple today.  How­ever of par­ti­cu­lar sig­nifi­cance to this arti­cle, was the bloc­kade of southern ports by Ameri­can navel ships.  This began on April 19th, just a few days after the fall of Fort Sump­ter.  Although this bloc­kade had only a limi­ted ef­fect ini­tia­lly, it grew un­til the Con­fe­der­ate States of Ame­rica were to­tally cut off from Great Bri­tain.

At this point you are no doubt won­der­ing what the Ameri­can Civil war had to do with India and tawaifs.  As it tur­ned out, it had every­thing to do with it.  We will see that this was one of the major rea­sons why India be­came so impor­tant to great Bri­tain's economy.  It be­came so impor­tant, that Great Bri­tain really had no choice but to in­vest con­si­der­able re­sour­ces to con­so­li­date its con­trol over the In­dian sub­con­ti­nent.  This en­tire si­tua­tion, comp­lete with its im­pe­rial­is­tic impli­cations, can be sum­med up in a sin­gle word - cot­ton!

By the mid­dle of the 19th cen­tury Great Bri­tain was pro­duc­ing half of the world's cot­ton tex­ti­les.  A sin­gle Bri­tish mill known as the Quarry Bank Mill in Che­shire ac­coun­ted for 0.6 percent of the en­tire world's pro­duc­tion alone!  Yet Bri­tain pro­du­ced abso­lutely no cot­ton ag­ri­cul­tur­ally.  There­fore, Bri­tain was comp­letely at the mercy of for­eign markets for its sup­ply of raw cot­ton.  In par­ti­cu­lar it was de­pen­dent upon three coun­tries, the US (Con­fe­der­ate States of Ame­rica), Egypt, and India.

English Textile Mill

English Textile Mill

The Ameri­can Civil war was having a de­vas­tat­ing ef­fect upon Great Bri­tain's tex­tile in­dus­try.  The dis­rup­tion in the sup­ply of cot­ton, meant that Great Bri­tain's tex­tile mills were only func­tion­ing at a frac­tion of their normal ca­pa­city.

There were only two other coun­tries that were left to sup­ply cot­ton to Great Bri­tain.  One of these was Egypt and the other was India.  Egypt was not under Bri­tish con­trol, so it was im­me­di­ately re­cog­nised that Bri­tain should not be­come de­pen­dent upon it.  India had just re­cen­tly come under the crown, so there really was not much de­bate in the mat­ter.  India had to be con­so­li­dated into the em­pire, even if for no other rea­son than to keep Bri­tain's tex­tile in­dus­try viable.  A major finan­cial in­vestment in India was not merely an op­tion; the Bri­tish tex­tile in­dus­try abso­lutely de­man­ded it.  The Bri­tish em­pire func­tioned like one giant im­pe­rial­is­tic ma­chine; and India was a major compo­nent of this giant ma­chine.

 

The Oil of the Machine

We invoked the meta­phor of a great im­pe­rial­is­tic ma­chine to des­cribe India's posi­tion in the Bri­tish em­pire.  If we push this meta­phor a bit fur­ther, there were a num­ber of de­ve­lop­ments which may be view as the "oil" of the ma­chine.  These were a num­ber of, in­ven­tions, and ev­ents, which made the ma­chine func­tion easier.  At first some of these points may seem un­im­port­ant, but just as a mighty ma­chine can be brought to a grind­ing halt by an ab­sence of oil, it is en­tirely pos­sible that if any one of these ev­ents had not hap­pened, the Bri­tish con­so­li­da­tion of India might not have oc­cur­red.

Cinchona, Quinine, and Malaria - In the early days of the East India Com­pany, re­la­ti­vely few Bri­tish came to India.  The large num­ber of dis­eases en­de­mic to the sub­con­ti­nent took a major toll.  Of all the dis­eases en­de­mic to the India, mal­aria had a special sig­nifi­cance.  Deaths fre­quen­tly oc­cur­red from a sort of "one-two-punch."  In this scenario, one would contract mal­aria.  Although death from mal­aria it­self was not very com­mon, it was a very de­bi­li­ta­ting dis­ease.  There­fore, once a per­son was weak­end by mal­aria, an­other dis­ease could come along, and the re­sult was often fatal.  It was clear that if mal­aria could be kept under con­trol, mor­tal­ity could be greatly re­duced.

The bark of the cinchona tree

A mat­ter of life or death - the bark of the cinchona tree

By the lat­ter part of the 18th cen­tury it was well known that the bark of the cin­chona plant was very ef­fec­tive in re­du­cing the de­bi­li­ta­ting ef­fects of mal­aria.  Cinchona is a tro­pi­cal shrub or small tree nat­ive to South Ame­rica.  The bark of the plant con­tains qui­nine and a num­ber of other drugs which are very ef­fec­tive at treat­ing mal­aria.

Unfortunately the cin­chona re­si­sted cul­ti­va­tion for a very long time.  This chan­ged in 1860 when cin­chona seed­lings were brought from South Ame­rica.  Plantations were es­tab­lished in Ceylon (pres­ent day Sri Lanka), the Nil­giri Hills (in the pres­ent day Tamil Nadu), and other parts of India.  By the lat­ter por­tion of the 19th cen­tury, cin­chona bark and its de­ri­va­tives (e.g., qui­nine) were re­la­ti­vely cheap and easily ob­tainable.  The re­sult­ing drop in mor­tal­ity in the Eu­ro­pean popu­la­tion made India a con­si­der­ably less harsh en­vi­ron­ment.

The Suez Canal - The op­en­ing of the Suez canal in 1869 had a major im­pact upon India's posi­tion in the em­pire.  It made it much easier to ship goods bet­ween India and Great Bri­tain.  By 1882 it is es­ti­ma­ted that Bri­tish commerce ac­coun­ted for more than 80% of the vol­ume of traf­fic through the canal.

The Suez Canal greatly im­proved trans­por­ta­tion bet­ween India and Great Bri­tain

The Suez Canal greatly im­proved trans­por­ta­tion bet­ween India and Great Bri­tain

Improvements In ship­ping tech­no­logy - Improvements in ship­ping also con­tribu­ted greatly to­wards in­crea­sed Bri­tish pre­sence in India.  The early 19th cen­tury saw a sharp rise in the avai­la­bi­lity of the clip­per ship.  These sail­ing vessels were manu­fac­tured in the Uni­ted States, Great Bri­tain, and to a les­ser ex­tent, in France.  They were much fas­ter than previous ships and made trans­por­ta­tion much easier.  How­ever, ship­ping tech­no­logy was im­pro­ving so fast that by the mid­dle of the 19th cen­tury, the clip­pers were al­ready on the de­cline.  One rea­son for their de­cline was the rising pop­ular­ity of steam ships.

Improvements in ship­ping tech­no­lo­gies reduce travel time bet­ween Bri­tain and India

Improvements in ship­ping tech­no­lo­gies reduce travel time bet­ween Bri­tain and India

Other Considerations - It is im­pos­sible to cata­logue all of the in­no­va­tions which made it easier for Bri­tain to con­so­li­date its con­trol over India.  Rail­roads, tele­graphs, im­proved roads, the list is al­most un­fa­thom­able.  How­ever at this point, I think that you get the pic­ture.

This comp­letes our dis­cus­sion of the con­so­li­da­tion of India into the Bri­tish em­pire.  We have shown in some de­tail how it came about, as well as the eco­nomic rea­sons that made it im­pera­tive.  This con­so­li­da­tion of India into the Bri­tish em­pire made a num­ber of so­cial pheno­mena pos­sible.  One of these was the the anti-Nautch move­ment.

 

 

Previous Page | Top of Page | Next Page




Part 1 - Introduction
Part 2 - The Tawaifs
Part 3 - Evolution of the Will to End the Tawaifs
Part 4 - Evolution of the Means to End the Tawaifs
Part 5 - The Anti-Nautch Move­ment - Next Page
Part 6 - The Passing of the Torch
Part 7 - Affects of the Anti-Nautch Move­ment on North In­dian Music
Part 8 - Epilogue

 

© 1998 - 2021 David and Chandrakantha Courtney

For comments, cor­rections, and sug­gestions, kindly contact David Courtney at [email protected]