NORTH INDIAN MUSICAL NOTATION - AN OVERVIEW

by David Courtney working tools


It is well known that In­dian music is based on an oral trad­ition.  How­ever, it is often erroneously presumed that this oral trad­ition precluded any mus­ical notation.  This is not the case; mus­ical notation in India extends back to the Vedas.  Musical notation, known as swar lipi has existed in India from ancient Vedic age up to the modern internet age.

 

 

Historical Overview

The his­tory of In­dian mus­ical notation is very rich.  Musical treatises have appeared throughout In­dian his­tory going all the way back to the Vedas.

The Vedic hymns were typically sung in three notes.  The cen­tral note was re­fer­red to as the "udatta". This was the default state and needed no notational element.  The upper note was called the "swarita".  This was denoted with a small vertical line over the syllable.  The lower note was called the "anudatta" and was denoted with a horizontal line underneath the syllable.

The Sangeet Ratnakar is a mus­ical treatise writ­ten in the 13th cen­tury by Sharangdev.  It is replete with well notated mus­ical examples.

Musical notations were used in a variety of texts through the next few centu­ries.  They were in many lan­gua­ges and a variety of scripts.

Modern mus­ical notation may be said to have begun with Vishnu Digambar Paluskar at the turn of the 20th cen­tury.  Paluskar's notational sys­tem was used by music colleges in Nort­hern India for the next few de­cades.  An example of Paluskar's notation is shown below:

Lippi #1

Although Paluskar's sys­tem was precise, it was dif­fi­cult.  It was soon to be replaced with an equally precise sys­tem, but one which was more intuitive. This sys­tem was introduced by Vishnu Narayan Bhatkhande.  Today it is his sys­tem which has be­come the standard.  An example of Bhatkhande's notational sys­tem is shown below:

 

Lippi #2

There are a few other minor sys­tems that may some­times be found.  One of which is Western staff notation.  Although this makes In­dian music ac­cessible to Eu­ro­peans and Ameri­cans, it has a poor acceptance within India (this will be dis­cus­sed later).  Another is the sys­tem in use by the Ali Akbar College.  There are prob­ably other minor sys­tems as well, but any notation other than Bhatkhande's is marginal and may be dis­counted.  They clearly do not have a wide acceptance.

 

Basics of Bhatkhande Notation

Let us be­come fami­liar with the par­ti­cu­lars of Bhatkhande's notational sys­tem.  The previous example is re-shown below with annotations to make it easier to follow:

 

Lippi #2

The above example was taken from Hindustani Sangeet Paddhati - Kramak Pustak Malika (Volume 4) (Bhatkhande, 1985).  How­ever we must not forget that Bhatkhande's sys­tem does not specify a script, therefore it can be writ­ten in other scripts such as the Roman script.

The above example shows two lines of a sthai in rag Basant.  We see that there is a melody line with the corresponding lyrics underneath.  This par­ti­cu­lar example is in tintal so the four vibhags are delineated with vertical lines.  The clapping arrangement is shown with the num­bers underneath each line.  (Some authors place these symbols at the top.)  There are also occasional grace notes which may be indicated.

The Bhatkhande sys­tem is a model of elegance and simplicity.  The basic notational elements are shown in the figure below:

Lippi #3

In the above table we see that one sim­ply has to write out the Sa, Re, Ga, etc.  The komal swar (flattened notes) are designated with a horizontal bar be­neath.  The only note which may be sharpened is the Ma, this is designated with a vertical line over it.  The var­ious claps of the tal are designated with their appropriate num­ber (e. g. "2" for the se­cond clap, "3" for the third clap etc.)  the khali is designated with a zero.  The sam is designated with an "X".  Some authors may use a "+".  The vibhag is just a vertical line.  A rest is indicated with a dash.  The register is indicated by placing dots either above or below the swar.  Finally comp­lex beats (matras) are indicated by a crescent be­neath the notes.

Although Hindi (Dev Nagri) is the most com­mon script, this is not specified in Bhatkhande notation.  One often finds Roman, Kannada or a variety of scripts used.

 

Musical Notation and the Internationalisation of North In­dian Music

There have been two overall ap­proaches to the internationalisation of north In­dian music notation.  One ap­proach is to translate every­thing into staff notation, and the other is to use a Bhatkhande notation, but shift the script to Roman script.

The use of staff notation for In­dian music is a very controversial issue.  It is true that staff notation has the widest acceptance outside of India.  This is no doubt a major advantage.  Unfor­tunately, the use of staff notation distorts the music by implying things that were never meant to be implied.

The biggest false impli­cation of staff notation is the key.  Western staff notation inherently ties the music to a par­ti­cu­lar key.  This is something that has never been implied in In­dian music.  The key is merely a ques­tion of per­sonal convenience.  Material is routinely transposed up and down to what­ever the musician finds comfortable.  Over the years a convention of transposing all material to the key of C has been adopted; unfortunately, this convention is us­ually not under­stood by the casual reader.

One other problem associated with staff notation is the impli­cation of equal-temperament.  This clearly is not implied in In­dian music.

Staff notation is not the only ap­proach to the internationalisation of North In­dian music, sim­ply writing in Roman script is the an­other ap­proach.  There are advantages and disadvantages to this.

The biggest advantage of writing Bhatkhande notation in Roman script is that it does not distort the ori­gi­nal material.  Since Bhatkhande's notation was never ac­tually tied to any par­ti­cu­lar script, it is arguable that this is really no change at all.  Fur­ther­more, the wides­pread acceptance of Roman script, even in India, means that it has a wide acceptance.

However, the use of Roman script / Bhatkhande notation is not with­out its deficiencies.  The biggest problem is that it abso­lutely requires a firm under­stand­ing of the struc­ture and theory of North In­dian music.  The practical realities of international book distribution and more es­pec­ially the Internet, means that information should be instantaneously ac­cessible.  One should not expect a casual visitor to a website, or a musician browsing through a music book, to in­vest the energy re­quired to master the Bhatkhande notation.

An easy way to promote the internationalisation of North In­dian music is with a combined notation.  An example of the basic struc­ture of rag Lalit in a combined notation is shown below:

Rag Lalit

ascending struc­ture of lalit
ascending struc­ture of lalit

Let us look at this example in greater de­tail.  We see that it starts with the staff notation.  This is an approximation of the Bhatkhande notation shown below it; in this par­ti­cu­lar example there are two sec­tions.  the first sec­tion is the ascending struc­ture of Lalit while the se­cond sec­tion is the descending struc­ture.

This notation pres­ents all of the clarity of Bhatkhande notation as well as the instant ac­cessibility of staff notation.  This is the rea­son why we use this ex­ten­sively throughout this site.

 


 

© 1998 - 2020 David and Chandrakantha Courtney

For comments, cor­rections, and sug­gestions, kindly contact David Courtney at [email protected]