French Flag
français

BOL, SOLKATU, KONNAKKOL - THE INDIAN RHYTHMIC MNEMONICS

by David Courtney working tools


The mnemonic syllables are an impor­tant part of In­dian rhythm.  They are var­iously re­fer­red to as bol, solkatu, or konnakkol.  These are syllables which correlate to the var­ious strokes of the tabla, mridangam, and pakhawaj as well as other classical per­cussive in­stru­ments.  Since they have such a wide usage across the clas­sical drums, we can as­sume that this custom is many centu­ries old.  Other­wise it would not have such a wide distri­bution.

There is a difference in the way that north In­dians and south In­dians view these syllables.  In the north (Hindu­stani sangeet) the tal is ac­tually de­fined by the bol, while in the south (Car­natic Sangeet) the syllables do not define the tal, but are gen­erally used as a mnemonic aid to the musician.  Fur­ther­more, the lexicon of syllables is very dif­fer­ent bet­ween North In­dian music­ians and South In­dian music­ians.  Even within the Car­natic / Hindu­stani sys­tems, there are smaller differences bet­ween the var­ious per­cussion in­stru­ments.

 

 

North In­dian Perspective

The mnemonic syllable of the north is known as bol.  This is der­ived from the word "bolna" which means "to speak". The con­cept of bol has a num­ber of dif­fer­ent char­acter­is­tics.  These relate to the man­ner in which the bol relates to the technique of the tabla.  They also relate to the way that the bol is used to define the tal.

The man­ner in which the bol relates to the technique of the tabla is perhaps the most impor­tant con­sideration of all.  This is des­cribed in greater de­tail under the topic "Basic Strokes and Bols".

One other topic is the way that North In­dian music­ians use the bol to define the tal.  The case of Tintal is a good example.  It goes like this:

 

TINTAL

(see also Tintal)

XDhaa Dhin Dhin Dhaa  |  2Dhaa Dhin Dhin Dhaa  |  0Dhaa Tin Tin Naa  |  3Naa Dhin Dhin Dhaa  |


There are other tals which have the same patterns of claps and waves as tintal, but they are con­si­dered separate tals be­cause the bol is dif­fer­ent.

Here are two examples:

 

TILWADA TAL

(see also "Tilwada Tal")

XDhaa TiRaKiTa Dhin Dhin  |  2Dhaa Dhaa Tin Tin  |  0Taa TiRaKiTa Dhin Dhin  |  3Dhaa Dhaa Dhin Dhin |

 

ADHA TAL

XDhaa  -  Dhin -  |  2Dhaa Dhaa Tin  -  |  0Taa  -  Tin  -  |  3Dhaa Dhaa Dhin  -  |

So here we have some­thing that is quite curious.  We have three distinct tals which share the same abs­tract struc­ture (i.e., claps, waves, num­bers of beats, and measures) but they are con­si­dered separate ONLY be­cause their bols are dif­fer­ent.  Historic­ally, this has not been the case.

There are a few twists when the bol is used in the accom­paniment of the kathak dance; This is known as padant.  These syllables may be a mix­ture of tabla bols, pakhawaj bols, bols that are peculiar to the kathak dance and at times even poetry and words.

 

South In­dian Perspective

The use of rhyt­hmic mnemonics in South India India is part of a very rich trad­ition.  It has a very impor­tant place in pedagogy and in the accompaniment of south In­dian classical dances.

In the south, the recitation of the rhyt­hmic syllables may be called seve­ral things.  One of the most com­mon is solkatu.  It is also known as konnakkol, which is der­ived from the Telugu phrase "Konu Kolu" which means a "measuring rod".

Unlike the recitation of the tabla bols in the North, the konnakkol is a highly re­spec­ted art in its own right.  It is said that in the old days, the recitation of the konnakkol was even more impor­tant than the mridangam per­formance for mus­ical programs.  Some of the great mas­ters of the past were Muthaiah Pillai, Ekambara Iyer, and Pakkiria Pillai.

There are a few fun­da­men­tal phrases upon which the south In­dian sys­tem is based.  These are:

                Thom - 1 Beat
                Ta Ka - 2 Beats
                Ta Ki Ta - 3 Beats
                Ta Ka Di Mi - 4 beats
                Ta Di Gi Na Thom - 5 beats

From these, larger and more comp­lex struc­tures can be constructed.  For insta­nce, TakKiTaTaKiTaTaKa (i.e., 3+3+2), or TaKaTaKaTaKaDiMi (i.e., 2+2+4) are all patterns which work well when set ag­ainst adi tal of eight beats.  As an­other example TaKiTaTaKaDiMi (i.e., 3+4) or TaKaTaKiTaTaKaTaKiTaTaKaDiMi (i.e., 2+3+2+3+4) work well for mishra chapu of seven beats.

There is an­other version of konnakkol which is known as nathuvangam.  This is the konnakkol which is used to sup­port the dance performances.  It is not sig­ni­fi­cantly dif­fer­ent from the regular konnakkol.

 

Philosophic Implications

The syllables are us­ually con­si­dered to be mere mnemonics which re­pre­sent the var­ious strokes of the tabla, mridangam or other percussive in­stru­ments; but perhaps this is not really cor­rect.  Perhaps it is really the strokes on the drum that re­pre­sent the syllables.  This is be­cause the syllables have been ele­vated to an abs­tract level that is at times divorced from the tech­nique used to sug­gest them.

This may be a hard con­cept to follow, so let us explain this a lit­tle more clearly.  Let us take a more fami­liar example such as the word "door".  The word door at first ap­pears to be solidly connected to that fami­liar household fixture.  It would seem that the utter­ance of this sin­gle syllable is there to remind us of this.  But when we look fur­ther, the word "door" starts to dis­connect from the fami­liar household fixture.  It begins to as­sume a broader sig­nifi­cance.  Take for example the expres­sions "doorway to the mind", or "door to the future".  One would have no problem think­ing of count­less other examples where "door" is used in a more abs­tract sense.  So now the re­la­tionship is no longer clear.  Is the word "door" a des­cription of the house­hold fixture, or is the house­hold door a physi­cal meta­phor for a larger philo­sophic con­cept?

This same ambiguous re­la­tionship is seen in the syllables for the In­dian drums.  Originally, they may have been mere onomato­poeic re­pre­sentations of the strokes.  How­ever, multi­ple ways to exe­cute the syllables have weakened this re­la­tionship.  Fur­ther­more, the syllables ac­quired their own syntax and grammar.  They are easily mani­pula­ted, with­out recourse to their technique.  In short, they have assu­med an identity all their own.

 


Selected Video

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

© 1998 - 2020 David and Chandrakantha Courtney

For comments, cor­rections, and sug­gestions, kindly contact David Courtney at [email protected]