Comments on: 308 Baudrillard: Fatal Strategies (1993) https://rickroderick.org/308-baudrillard-fatal-strategies-1993/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=308-baudrillard-fatal-strategies-1993 Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:56:54 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.6 By: Ian Maza https://rickroderick.org/308-baudrillard-fatal-strategies-1993/#comment-109299 Mon, 24 Sep 2018 23:52:00 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=76#comment-109299 In reply to Ian Maza.

Into tribes *

The way the real fragments into images seems to be the same problem people like zizek, chomsky, and Peterson worry about.

]]>
By: Ian Maza https://rickroderick.org/308-baudrillard-fatal-strategies-1993/#comment-109298 Mon, 24 Sep 2018 23:49:03 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=76#comment-109298 In reply to David.

I completely disagree. The disappearance of the real can be seen in our youth losing the power of their memory and lose of social skills due to the new media we consume.

The blurring of them lines between traditional categories and I to tribes that we elect to be part of happens to be a popular thought with identity marketers like Seth Godin.

There are more real life examples to fill into the post moderns.

]]>
By: David https://rickroderick.org/308-baudrillard-fatal-strategies-1993/#comment-109291 Sat, 14 Jul 2018 20:41:07 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=76#comment-109291 In reply to Brian Coyle.

Years later (after watching these lectures, and reading Baudrillard and Foucault because of them), I have to agree with you. Or at least share the sentiment. These books have a very particular impact on young susceptible students. It is always the same demographic. There is the definite occasional truth to the lush observations, but the world isn’t “disappearing.” However, spending too much time in your apartment reading philosophy books might convince you that it is, and make you “disappear.” Irony in irony, huh?

]]>
By: Socrates https://rickroderick.org/308-baudrillard-fatal-strategies-1993/#comment-75630 Tue, 09 Dec 2014 01:16:57 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=76#comment-75630 In reply to Brian Coyle.

You definitively lack a sense of irony in your interpretation of Baudrillard’s comment on the virtual of Gulf’s War. On the other hand, your appreciation of French culture is totally biased. A misleading nationalism is clear in your lines of thought.

You need more of real philosophy, my friend!

]]>
By: Brian Coyle https://rickroderick.org/308-baudrillard-fatal-strategies-1993/#comment-31175 Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:48:33 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=76#comment-31175 Baudrillard’s manic performance suggests the attenuation of philosophy into entertainment. He and Foucault try to extinguish moral reasoning, yet what they really do is show this is impossible. Baudrillard isn’t honest, or he would gladly offer to take the place of a rural African. Whenever someone’s thesis aligns with lazy attitudes, thinking, or action, it’s questionable. His decision to “witness” the (first) Gulf War from his Paris apartment is such an example. Prof. Roderick can find soldiers who experienced the war as a game, or experienced it more fully as a “simulacra.” But he’s then entered the world of data, and other soldiers experienced it as real. The book (and movie) Jarhead, a memoir, is a fine example of this more complicated data. Its author does find the war a bizarrely unreal phenomena at times, yet finds reality slicing through as well. All war involves a “fog”, which so confuses some participants they can’t get their head around it. That doesn’t make it unreal.

The French economy is the most significant producer of fashion, beauty products, perfumes, and other things that enhance a person’s attractiveness. Besides the inherent merits of these products, the cache of French sophistication is an important marketing feature. This helps explain France’s resistance to U.S. culture; to Americanize could jeopardize their export economy. Foucault, Derrida, and Baudrillard play a role in this, surely without realizing it. Their lush deconstruction of modernity, with playful eroticism, provides an intellectual soupcon for the undergraduate, the artiste, eager to find partners. Later, perhaps, they’ll indulge in Givenchy and Moet. By then, Baudrillard will be collecting dust on her shelf.

]]>
By: al https://rickroderick.org/308-baudrillard-fatal-strategies-1993/#comment-10892 Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:57:57 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=76#comment-10892 Cool is not enough: Thank You

]]>
By: alfred https://rickroderick.org/308-baudrillard-fatal-strategies-1993/#comment-10891 Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:56:03 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=76#comment-10891 Our man is as always (amost) ahead of his time,my time and your time-if you dont mind the impertenance!!? much more than any old Philosipher he was a jaz player/provocketer.Not only did he hold a candle up to us but could wield a mean torch aswell-his no-stone (not even The Rolling sort) unturned approach left us plenty of work to do because we all have to turn our own stones but he left us with a great sence of direccion recovered-or at least the exposed wound that our direccion is being heavily tampered with but with corage and determinacion bottom-line recoverable.

]]>