Comments on: 202 Nietzsche on Truth and Lie (1991) https://rickroderick.org/202-nietzsche-on-truth-and-lie-1991/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=202-nietzsche-on-truth-and-lie-1991 Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:43:14 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.6 By: Fr. Emmanuel Ogundele https://rickroderick.org/202-nietzsche-on-truth-and-lie-1991/#comment-44589 Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:16:35 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=53#comment-44589 Rick was not only a good philosopher, he was a great teacher and communicator. I love to always listen to him. Such a great loss. Rest in Peace.

]]> By: Yi https://rickroderick.org/202-nietzsche-on-truth-and-lie-1991/#comment-34606 Tue, 20 Aug 2013 04:35:16 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=53#comment-34606 In reply to Ray Valdez.

It seems that there is some foucaultian factors in this lecture, just like some Nehamasian factors (the book ‘life as literature’) in the first lecture.

]]> By: Ray Valdez https://rickroderick.org/202-nietzsche-on-truth-and-lie-1991/#comment-4774 Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:38:04 +0000 http://rickroderick.org/?p=53#comment-4774 I think that by “sero tantum” he means quantum zero, kinda trying to say vacuum state.

]]>