News - Views - Reviews

    

MADRAS MUSIC MELA 2001

     

T N SESHAGOPALAN - VARIABLE ADHERENCE TO SRUTI

    

T N Seshagopalan has the ability to traverse a wide range with great speed, and is a quite creative musician when it comes to manodharma. However, if Sruti is mother and laya father, then Seshagopalan stands accused of often ignoring the mother, while paying inordinate attention to the other parent. Those who listen to him often learn to modify their expectations accordingly and to correct for this problem within their own listening experience. The only other fly in the ointment is his penchant for overdoing things.

     
Accounting for these factors, his concert on Tuesday, December 11, at the Narada Gana Sabha Hall, under the auspices of Kartik Fine Arts was quite rewarding. Seshagopalan seemed to have been affected by a sore throat problem that seems to be ubiquitous nowadays.
     

Beginning with Vatapi (Hamsadhwani), he went on to Telisi Rama (Purnachandrika), which was rendered very briskly. The tendency to overdo briga-s came through in this piece. Angarakam (Surati) was preceded by a good alapana and a Viruttam-style rendering of the sloka Dharanigarbha sambhutam. The neraval and swaraprastara were brief. The highlight of the day was Ennalu (Subhapantuvarali). The expansive alapana was rendered in a highly Hindustani style, with much better attention to sruti fidelity than one had expected. Seshagopalan is thus capable of checking his voice’s tendency to deviate from Sruti, so one hopes that will bring this level of control to bear into the more classically Carnatic ragas too. The Kriti and swaraprastara returned to the Carnatic style and made his mastery over laya patently evident even to the uninitiated. Enduku Peddala (Sankarabharanam) followed immediately after, and featured the Tani Avartanam by Vellore Ramabhadran on Mridangam and Vikku Vinayakram on Ghatam.
      

One is generally used to seeing violinists faltering when trying to cope with Seshagopalan, but this was not a problem for this concert. Delhi Sundararajan handled the swaraprastara-s quite well, and his accompaniment was of fairly high quality in other aspects too. The percussion, as may be expected of such artistes as Ramabhadran and Vinayakram, was quite enjoyable, particularly in the dimension of playing for Kritis.

This reviewer cannot help but comment on the average behaviour of the audience during the concert. Frequent applause, as was heard in the midst of the Subhapantuvarali alapana, is quite avoidable. However, it was also perplexing that a steady stream of people kept leaving the hall after it was over.

General remarks:

Voice: Somewhat scratchy, especially in the higher octave; more comfortable in the middle & lower octaves.
Acoustics: Overall too loud; balancing poor. The first 20 minutes of the concert sounded like the sound-check phase.
Hall AC: A little too cold.

Ratings:

Fidelity to sruti - 60 %
Sahitya - 75 %
Rendering of Compositions - 80 %
Alapana - 80 %
Neraval - 80 %
Kalpanaswaras - 85 %
Sowkhyam - 60 %

Overall effect:

Vocalist - 65%
Violin - 75%
Mridangam & Ghatam - 75%

Concert - 70%

Estimated audience ratings:

Crowd in hall - 75% in the beginning, 50% towards the end.
Response for item selection: Effusive for Subhapantuvarali alapana, average for others.
Concert success - 80%

- Nisshanka

      

Posted on December 13, 2001

    

More reviews

   
Lec-dem Schedule

Programme Schedule

List of Awardees

   
Interviews with Awardees

Reports

Mirch Masala

Interviews with Organisers

      

Entire MMM 2001 coverage

    

  

themehome.jpg (1315 bytes)